

One Single Triops isn't called a Triop.
Why?
Well we asked our expert at the
Department of Zoomorphology of Zoological Institute, University of
Copenhagen, Ole Sten Møller. Here is what he
had to say on the subject:
Remember that a single member of the genus Triops is not called
"a Triop" !! The genus name Triops
must considered a natural "singularis" because there's only
one genus of that name. However, this gives us a problem, if we want to
use "pluralis". A way around it is to use the
orders name Notostraca and calling the little
critters notostracans (in pluralis). The singular form then
becomes "a notostracan" which sounds as an adjective but
isn't. It's usable but it's not quite good.
One might go so far as to leave Latin behind by calling them shield
shrimps. This can be dangerous because one
might get "wrong" ideas when using the term
"shrimp". (The Notostraca is an order within the class
Branchiopoda. What normally qualifies as
"shrimps" (for example for eating) are members of the order
Decapoda, in the class Malacostraca placing them very far,
systematically
speaking, from the Branchiopoda.)
The correct way of writing the binominal Latin names is
using a capital first letter in the genus name and
all other letters in lower case. Furthermore one
should use italics (or underline) in both genus and species
name . The first time one uses a binominal name it
is written in full and the original author is cited (if one has this
information) right behind the species name:
Triops cancriformis (Bosc)
Triops longicaudatus (Leconte)
The parenthesis indicates that Bosc or Leconte described it first,
but it has since been moved to another genus or
the genus has been renamed. The species name cannot
be changed.
After the first use of the name one is allowed to shorten the genus
name down to a single letter eg:
T. cancriformis
T. longicaudatus
(But as always both should be in italics. Remember that most modern
word-processors automatically changes the first letter
after the full stop to a capital one, which would
be wrong in this case!!)
|